How many elderly patients with insomnia
use over-the-counter sleep aids that contain antihistamines?
Could these drugs be the reason for morning confusion? Do
they affect daytime cognitive function? Do they contribute
to drowsiness, dizziness, fatigue and impaired performance?
Dr. Ronald Pies cites several studies and discusses the use
of OTC antihistamines in an article titled, To Sleep,
Perchance to Take OTC Antihistamines in the June, 2003
issue of Psychiatric Times.
A recent study found use of diphenhydramine is increasing
among older people (Basu et al. 2003). The most common antihistamines
used in OTC sleep aids are diphenhydramine hydrochloride (brand
names include: Benedryl, Sominex and Unisom SoftGels
and doxylamine, Unisom Sleep Tabs, in 25
mg to 50 mg dosages. Even though their efficacy and safety
is poorly documented, first generation antihistamines such
as diphenhydramine (Benedryl) seem to be used frequently in
nursing homes in spite of their effects on daytime cognitive
function.
As sleep inducing agents, H1 antagonists suppress the wake
promoter pathway and cause the person to sleep. Generally,
histamine-1 receptor antagonists (H1 blockers) are divided
into first-generation and second- generation agents. First-generation
agents are stronger sedatives and have greater effect on autonomic
receptors (Katzung and Julius, 2001). Second-generation
agents including fexofenadine (Allegra) and loratadine (Claratin)
are less sedating because of reduced absorption into
the central nervous system. Besides their antihistaminic effects,
these drugs also produce significant atropine-like effects
on peripheral receptors.
First generation H1 blockers can affect psychomotor performance
without causing sleep (Okamura et al. 2000). Side effects
included drowsiness, dizziness, grogginess and fatigue that
are consistent with the sedating effect of diphenhydramine
(Rickels et al. 1983). In a recent search in PubMed for literature
on this topic, out of thirteen studies, only two were conducted
on elderly subjects. This is disturbing because of the widespread
use of this substance in treating sleep disorders in seniors
especially in nursing homes.
In a random, double-blind study of 50 mg diphenhydramine
given twice a day to healthy men between the ages of 18 to
50, both objective and subjective measures of sleepiness was
significantly higher on day one than on day four. Performance
was greatly impaired on day one but had essentially disappeared
by day four (Richardson et al 2002). Conclusion: tolerance
was reached by day three and since tolerance was reached so
quickly, it is unlikely that taking diphen-hydramine for more
than a few days would be beneficial to most people with chronic
insomnia. However, it seems likely that in patients with dementia,
the effects could lead to confusion after the sleep-inducing
effects have worn off.
There is also the potential for abuse of OTC antihistamines.
In 1997, a liquid-filled capsule with 50 mg of diphenhydramine
(Sleepia) was introduced in Great Britain. Statements in the
advertising included: “non-habit forming” and
“helps restore natural sleep” (Roberts et al.
1997). A few months after its introduction, pharmacists in
Scotland noticed “requests for excessive quantities
of the product by patients on the supervised methadone programme.”
Apparently, the drug was being injected. Soon after, the manufacturer
withdrew the product from Great Britain. With its
documented abuse in liquid form, the potential of abuse in
non-injectable forms must be considered.
Another potentially serious complication is drug-to-drug
interaction. Since patients may be using OTC antihistamines
without their doctors’ knowledge, the possibility of
unexpected drug reactions is considerable. Diphenhydramine
inhibits the CYP systems (Lessard et al. 2001) which helps
metabolize many psychotropic drugs and other medications including
antidepressants, anti-inflammatory drugs and codeine, which
are often prescribed for the elderly, suggests the possibility
of interactions should not be ignored.
Conclusion: most OTC sleep aids have not been studied adequately.
Diphenhydramine does seem to be superior to a placebo in most
double blind, placebo-controlled studies. But the studies
were of short duration and utilized patients with mild to
moderate insomnia and, in several cases, only subjective measures
of quality, quantity and maintenance were used. There
are no recent studies of the long-term (three weeks plus)
effect of the drug on chronic insomnia. It appears the drug
loses its effectiveness after a few days and, even though
side effects eventually diminish, they cause severe daytime
cognitive dysfunction in the elderly. There is also a huge
potential for abuse of diphen-hydramine as well as the real
possibility of dangerous drug interactions with other medications
commonly prescribed for seniors. Available evidence
suggests that diphenhydramine (and related drugs) are not
a viable treatment plan for patients with chronic insomnia
and should not be used daily or for more than three weeks
consecutively.
To quote Dr. Peis, “So why has that patient in the
nursing home been taking 50 mg of diphenhydramine every night
for the last two months?”
This summary is from an article in the June, 2003 Psychiatric
Times by Ronald Pies, M.D., titled To Sleep, Perchance
to Take OTC Antihistamines.
|